
So I watched all 3 hours and 42 minutes of 1959’s Ben-Hur on Sunday. And man, oh man, there was a period of a couple of hours where I thought this new project of mine might be dead in the water. Why I decided to start with what is probably the longest movie on the list (I’m honestly scared to look at run times now), I have no idea. Nevertheless, I persisted. So now I’m going to attempt my best approximation of a movie review. This probably goes without say, but SPOILER ALERT.
As I watched this movie, I took notes in my 87-cent Walmart notebook (thank you, school supply season!). The very first thing written in this notebook is, “Why don’t movies have overtures anymore?!” Nothing sets the tone of a film quite like a nice piece of classical music. A flash of Gone with the Wind came across my brain as I listened, being that GWTW is the only movie I’d ever seen with an overture. But this overture lets the audience know what kind of movie they’re in for from the get-go. The overture screams, “This movie is long, slow burn, so you better get nice and comfy!”
Going into this movie, I knew three things: (1) It’s long, (2) It’s old, (3) There are chariots races. That’s it. That was my entire understanding of the movie Ben-Hur going into it. I was definitely not wrong about (1) and (2), although as it turns out there isn’t a whole lot of chariot racing in this movie- one chariot race towards the end.
So what did I like about this movie? First of all, Charlton Heston is hard not to watch. On top of having the most gorgeous set of eyes, he’s also a damn good actor. I don’t know that I’ve ever seen him act, though I certainly knew his name before watching this movie. He steals every scene he is in and makes you care about this character, even after 3 hours and 42 minutes.
I also enjoyed the intertwining of the fictitious story with historical, biblical events. It was a bizarre experience watching a move in which the birth and death of Jesus Christ is portrayed without ever making it the focal point of the movie. This is about a man’s journey towards inner peace and away from vengeance, and what better role model could he have for this than Jesus Christ?
It was also apparent, even to a layperson such as myself, that the filmmakers were extremely intentional with everything from the sets to the music to the choices of color. The filmmakers were telling the audience in no uncertain terms that Judah is our hero in this story and Messala the evil villain. Take the chariot race, for instance. Judah is wearing blue while standing in a gold and white chariot pulled by white horses. Messala, on the other hand, is wearing mostly black while standing in a red chariot pulled by black horses. It could not be more obvious who the audience is supposed to be rooting for, even if you jumped into the movie at that exact moment.
While I’m on the subject of the chariot race, what a beautiful scene!!! I later read that it took five weeks to shoot that part of the film, and that is abundantly clear by the shear scope and detail in that scene. I found myself wondering how they even had the technology to pull off such a thing in the fifties. I could feel the complete absence of CGI, which is something that we rarely get to experience in this day and age. Heck, even Star Wars can’t be watched anymore without the awful, digital additions- a conversation for another day. And I honestly think that being forced to build or buy everything that shows up in the finished film lends itself to my previous point about intentional film-making.
Now, what did I not enjoy so much? Well, first of all, my generation was not built for long, slow burns. We are so impatient and so unwilling to focus that movie trailers now have tiny teasers of the trailer before the trailer even plays! Apparently, a minute and a half is just too long to hold our focus, so nearly four hours was borderline torture. However, this isn’t really the movie’s fault. It wasn’t made for me or my generation. It was made for my grandparents’ generation. Many of the same people seeing this movie in the theatre upon its original release had probably also seen some of the first talkies ever made. So I can completely understand why this movie was both critically acclaimed and loved by moviegoers at the time.
I also didn’t really buy into Judah’s romance with Esther. Given the length of this movie, there really could have been more build-up towards their flirtation and eventual first kiss. In fact, Judah had much more on-screen chemistry with Messala than with Esther- although that would’ve been a COMPLETELY different film, and I doubt Jesus would’ve been in it.
Although this film wasn’t really my style, I can definitely see the influence that it’s since had on Hollywood. I am far from a movie expert and I noticed several parallels between this movie and more modern films. For instance, Jack and Rose could totally have both fit on that floating debris as demonstrated in this movie!
For my closing thoughts, I want to answer a few questions that I plan to answer as a summary for each movie review.
- Did I like the movie? Overall, not really.
- Did I appreciate the movie? Yes.
- Would I recommend this movie to a friend? Probably not.
- Do I plan to see this movie again? Nope!
- Am I glad I have now watched this movie? Yes. (Now I need a bumper stick that says 3:42 so everyone knows about my accomplishment!)
Next up is Toy Story! Stay tuned for my next entry!